davewill Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Hope this looks better 2.0 TDCi (140bhp) Titanium 5d 53 mpg 139 g/km E Road Tax | Company Cars 2.0 TDCi (140bhp) Titanium 5d Powershift 49 mpg 149 g/km F Road Tax | Company Cars 2.0 TDCi (163bhp) Titanium 5d 53 mpg 139 g/km E Road Tax | Company Cars 2.0 TDCi (163bhp) Titanium 5d Powershift 49 mpg 149 g/km Quote
Scorpiorefugee Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Given that all of these figures depend on fuel quality, tyres and pressure, air temperature etc., I wonder just how much fiddling goes on behind the scenes Quote
philce Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 Hope this looks better 2.0 TDCi (140bhp) Titanium 5d53 mpg139 g/kmERoad Tax | Company Cars2.0 TDCi (140bhp) Titanium 5d Powershift49 mpg149 g/kmFRoad Tax | Company Cars2.0 TDCi (163bhp) Titanium 5d53 mpg139 g/kmERoad Tax | Company Cars2.0 TDCi (163bhp) Titanium 5d Powershift49 mpg149 g/km Thanks for that. So mine was registered june 2013, yet for the powershift 163 V5 shows 159g/km. From the Parkers site it says this. from 1 April 2013 Registration Date 6 months 12 months First Year Rate VED Band CO2 15 Mar 2010 - 25 Nov 2013 Quote
Scorpiorefugee Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 At least it's reassuring that a lot of people are now in well paid jobs specialising in creating all of this confusion and paying taxes rather than sitting on their backsides being paid for doing nothing. On balance, I think we'd be better off if they went back to just sitting on their backsides. Quote
chrispb123456 Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 I was going to post info sheet (came with the car) that lists the CO2 emissions specific for that vehicle (do you have one with yours) but this forum is still allowing attachments so will post the link to a forum that works properly :angry: http://www.forum.fordmpv.com/smf2/technical-6/environmental-information-sheet/ Quote
Scorpiorefugee Posted March 21, 2014 Report Posted March 21, 2014 (edited) Interesting looking forum which looks much more active on the MKIII. The fuel consumption figures look optimistic as usual but that's nothing new.A lot of familiar users and some recent topics. I'll have a longer browse later. Thank Chris. Edited March 21, 2014 by Scorpiorefugee Quote
Scorpiorefugee Posted March 24, 2014 Report Posted March 24, 2014 yes :rolleyes:This is getting cryptic. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.