comrad x Posted February 5, 2011 Report Posted February 5, 2011 I am thinking of buying a galaxy cica 98 - 02 and was wondering the usual ...which model ,which engine and any realy bad things to wwach for thanks tony Quote
edatelder Posted February 5, 2011 Report Posted February 5, 2011 Latest possible TDI diesel with Ghia trim and metallic paint.Long MOT. Good tyres. Read the FAQs page. Quote
gbrvww Posted February 5, 2011 Report Posted February 5, 2011 I have a 2002 2.0 litre on LPG. It is reliable and spacious but engine performance is poor. Next time, I would go for 2.3 litres or diesel. Quote
daddyfixit Posted February 5, 2011 Report Posted February 5, 2011 mk2 shape tdi, manual box with proper service history. Quote
bingo nightly Posted February 6, 2011 Report Posted February 6, 2011 Yes I agree it really has to be a MK 2 diesel Ghia with history for the best package of economy, reasonable performance, comfort and retention of value. 2 litre petrols are gutless, 2.3's are a nice engine, cheap to buy and reasonable economy I suppose if your mileage is very low.You would really need to be a screaming wild eyed lunatic to buy a V6............ahem, like mine. :unsure: Quote
cyborg Posted February 8, 2011 Report Posted February 8, 2011 2.8 24v expolice screamingly fast svt fixed sounds expensive but with 6th gear suprising not 37-45 mpg on run 28+ round town no waiting for heat cold winter morning +no driving like grandad on a sunday drive to get anywahere+keep street cred kids will notice dads bought a tank +not bothered about changing gear to get up the kerb +diesel costs 31p a gallon more for now ...+no crap turbo vanes +no oh ill just spend my weekend in the snow try to fix shocking bad aux heater+petrol 6.49 a gallon diesel 6.80 a gallonno impatent drivers behind you giving you the bird as they pass yes diesel drivers this is why every gives you a salute as they pass +no pretending its fast just cos you bought the 150 bhp version + So 10 + reasons why Petrolheads rule & diesels suck eggs :) Quote
kebrina Posted February 9, 2011 Report Posted February 9, 2011 Yes I agree it really has to be a MK 2 diesel Ghia with history for the best package of economy, reasonable performance, comfort and retention of value. 2 litre petrols are gutless, 2.3's are a nice engine, cheap to buy and reasonable economy I suppose if your mileage is very low.You would really need to be a screaming wild eyed lunatic to buy a V6............ahem, like mine. :blush: I also belong to the screaming wild eyed lunatic club, but it's a gorgeous car, and I am now a lot fitter due to walking more and thinking twice before turning that key... oooohhhhhhhh it's thirsty. Quote
bingo nightly Posted February 9, 2011 Report Posted February 9, 2011 Yes I agree it really has to be a MK 2 diesel Ghia with history for the best package of economy, reasonable performance, comfort and retention of value. 2 litre petrols are gutless, 2.3's are a nice engine, cheap to buy and reasonable economy I suppose if your mileage is very low.You would really need to be a screaming wild eyed lunatic to buy a V6............ahem, like mine. :46: I also belong to the screaming wild eyed lunatic club, but it's a gorgeous car, and I am now a lot fitter due to walking more and thinking twice before turning that key... oooohhhhhhhh it's thirsty. On my 3 minute, 1 mile drive to work (I will resume cycling as soon as its not dark when I go home.....its a very busy road rural road with no pavement) I often see 2.5 mpg displayed. But this often rises to an indicated 8 or even 9 mpg by the time I get there so thats not too bad is it?Almost miserly consumption in fact. B) I ran an old Range Rover years ago, and it once had a problem with the starter motor, I needed petrol and so said to my mate who was with me that I would just leave it ticking over while I filled up. After a couple of minutes of me pumping fuel while the big v8 chugged away he leaned out of the window and said "you'd better switch off, I think its gaining on you" :blush: Quote
bingo nightly Posted February 9, 2011 Report Posted February 9, 2011 I would add that I have had some experience of the diesel variants. The first Galaxy I had a go in was a 115bhp version that belonged to a mate. After about 2 miles I decided I couldn't live with it, and in fact he sold it 6 months later as he found it too sluggish to pull his caravan..........said he was down to 2nd gear a on some of those long hills through Cornwall I had a 150bhp version as a courtesy car for 2 weeks and that was much better, quite quick off the mark in fact, and very frugal but they were way above my budget and my annual mileage is low so I considered a 2.3, but having once owned a 2 litre Capri and having all the time wished it was a 2.8 injection I thought sod it and got a V6 Galaxy. The chap I bought it from was replacing it with a newer model also a V6. Its a lovely car, smooth and quiet, tows a caravan with ease....cruise control set and sit back until the seaside appears on the horizon!I would like to have a go in a MK 2 V6 to see how it compares though. In conclusion, if you want a sensible car get a diesel, if you can't run to a diesel and your mileage is very low consider a 2.3 petrol, or if you are a petrol head get a V6. Quote
gregers Posted February 9, 2011 Report Posted February 9, 2011 if you have long arms and short pockets,then defo get a v6 :blush: my 115 is fast enough when needed,but as its a people carrier i dont expect it to do 0-60 in 5 seconds. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.