robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 Has anyone that has fitted larger aftermarket wheels had their speedo recalibrated after they have had the wheels fitted? Cheers Rob. Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 I have just found out that the standard 215/55 r16 wheel and tyre has a rolling radius of 642mmand the the tyres i would fit to a new set of 18's would be 235/40 r18 which has a rolling radius of 645mm, surely 3mm difference would hardly effect the speedo reading if at all????? Quote
gregers Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 3 points?worst case senario, :) Quote
Saif Rehman Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 Speedometers, generally speaking are normally calibrated to show a slightly faster speed than actually travelling, so a difference of 3mm rolling radius will not make a significant difference in what is shown on the speedometer. Quote
gregers Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 Speedometers, generally speaking are normally calibrated to show a slightly faster speed than actually travelling, so a difference of 3mm rolling radius will not make a significant difference in what is shown on the speedometer. saif,have you tried this with a sat nav,my garmin is only about 1 mph difference from the speedo readout.but i agree the speedo is a guestamation. Quote
mk2vr6 Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 I have just found out that the standard 215/55 r16 wheel and tyre has a rolling radius of 642mmand the the tyres i would fit to a new set of 18's would be 235/40 r18 which has a rolling radius of 645mm, surely 3mm difference would hardly effect the speedo reading if at all????? really? where did you get your figures from? 215/55/16 = 321.45mm rr 235/40/18 = 322.6mm rr a difference of 7.22mm or 0.36% so at 70 your speedo will be reading 70.25mph your stating the diameter of the wheel to have a rr of that size (1284mm) would mean more than just rolling the arches! and dropping the car by 50mm wouldnt make much difference to the handling! I think JCB's run rear tyres the size you quoteing :) Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 This is the website i got my info from mk2vr6 http://www.performancetyresdirect.co.uk/co.../converter.html Quote
Saif Rehman Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 saif,have you tried this with a sat nav,my garmin is only about 1 mph difference from the speedo readout.but i agree the speedo is a guestamation. gregers, my Tomtom sat-nav would read 70mph when my car speedometer would be showing 67-68mph. I've tried it with other sat-navs and all show about the same readings i.e. car speedo showing 2-3mph less than sat-navs. I assume thats why police cars get a proper speedo calibration done to their cars because normal speedometers have a degree of inaccruacy. Quote
gregers Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 as im reading my speedo which could be wrong to how im sitting behind the wheel?be intresting to see what a digital speedo reads compared to a sat nav. Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 was the info i got from that website right, and was i right in thinking it was stating rolling radius? Quote
Saif Rehman Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 robpol and mk2vr6, I've just spent the best part of 10 minutes trailling through websites for "tyre rolling radius" and can see both websites where the robpol and mk2vr6 got there information from and to be honest my brain is frazzelled with figures so i am gonna bail out until someone who can explain in layman terms where these figures come from or how they are calculated. :) Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 saif, i've just found conflicting websites too, lol, i wonder what i found first was rolling raduis? Sounds as if i could have been wrong? Quote
Saif Rehman Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 saif, i've just found conflicting websites too, lol, i wonder what i found first was rolling raduis? Sounds as if i could have been wrong? I think where we are getting confused with is all to do with terms used on these websites like 'static rolling radius', 'rolling radius', 'diameter', and 'circumference'. You were partially correct with your figure which is the diameter...........anyway, back to your query, the difference will be very slight and not worth worrying about. Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 (edited) 215/55/16 = 321.45mm rr235/40/18 = 322.6mm rr a difference of 7.22mm or 0.36% so at 70 your speedo will be reading 70.25mph mk2 surly thats a difference of 1.15mm or am i getting this all wrong? Edited December 15, 2009 by robpol Quote
mk2vr6 Posted December 15, 2009 Report Posted December 15, 2009 215/55/16 = 321.45mm rr235/40/18 = 322.6mm rr a difference of 7.22mm or 0.36% so at 70 your speedo will be reading 70.25mph mk2 surly thats a difference of 1.15mm or am i getting this all wrong? it is 1.22 my bad doing to many things at the same time! cant multi task well add up, type, play travian, drink beer and eat .... something has to go wrong and I aint wasteing food or beer :) Quote
robpol Posted December 15, 2009 Author Report Posted December 15, 2009 something has to go wrong and I aint wasteing food or beer wink.gif Well said that man!!! :) Quote
big_kev Posted December 16, 2009 Report Posted December 16, 2009 Surely there would be a bigger difference in the rolling radius of brand new tyres and nearly bald ( just legal say ! ). Quote
robpol Posted December 16, 2009 Author Report Posted December 16, 2009 Yeah i was thinking that too last night Kev.... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.